Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018135›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Revisiting Target-Aware de novo Molecular Generation with TarPass: Between Rational Design and Texas Sharpshooter.

Rui Qin, Zijie Chen, Yurong Li, Meijing Fang, Longji Shen, Yilong Su, Odin Zhang, Qinghan Wang, Qun Su, Jike Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rui QinCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zijie ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yurong LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Meijing FangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Longji ShenCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yilong SuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Odin ZhangDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qinghan WangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qun SuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jike WangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tingjun HouCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yu KangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Funds Project 2025ZY01022National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFA1307501National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target-aware molecular generation models hold promise for drug discovery, but it remains unclear whether they genuinely exploit target information or merely resemble the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy by retrospectively rationalizing outputs. To address this, we introduce TarPass, a benchmark comprising a curated dataset of 18 well-studied targets with expert-annotated key interactions and experimentally validated active compounds, enabling fair evaluation of target-aware de novo molecular generation models. We assessed 15 representative models across three paradigms: non-3D, 3D in situ, and optimization-based, considering protein-ligand interactions (PLIs), molecular plausibility, and drug-likeness. Results show that 3D in situ models have a modest average advantage in predicted PLIs. However, many fail to outperform random sampling. Non-3D models, benefiting from broader pretraining, generate more drug-like and synthesizable molecules but exhibit weaker target specificity. Optimization-based methods effectively redirect outputs toward favorable chemical regions for single properties, often at the expense of others, for example by reducing compliance with Lipinski's rules. Integrating these insights, we propose a multi-tier virtual screening workflow for target-aware molecular generation as a post-processing strategy to enrich molecules with improved PLIs and plausibility. Overall, this study highlights the limitations of current models in capturing fine-grained target-specific constraints and provides a standardized framework for future structure-based drug design.

Indexed as

Drug DesignDrug DiscoveryModels, MolecularHumansLigandsLigands

Identifiers

PMID42018135
PMCPMC13335704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.