Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018222›Full record

ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026

Individualized fertility preservation counselling for women with endometriosis-a systematic review.

Julia Téoule, Karin Bundschu, Katharina Hancke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia TéouleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany. Julia.teoule@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Karin BundschuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
Katharina HanckeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic disease that may require surgical intervention under certain circumstances. Although the condition itself is associated with impaired fertility in 30-50% of affected individuals, surgical treatment may further reduce ovarian reserve and thereby additionally compromise fertility. As fertility preservation (FP) is increasingly being considered in this context, a clear understanding of how ovarian surgery affects the remaining follicle reserve and the outcome of oocyte cryopreservation is essential to guide counselling on the appropriate timing. The purpose of this study is to summarize the available evidence on the impact of ovarian surgery on oocyte retrieval outcomes in the context of FP and to propose a counselling framework based on these findings. The search of electronic databases identified seven observational studies on this topic. In terms of oocyte cryopreservation outcomes, the included studies consistently reported a decrease in the total number of oocytes retrieved in cases of previous surgery for endometriosis. Reported mean or median oocyte numbers ranged approximately from 8 to 14 per cycle in non-operated patients, with significantly lower yields in previously operated women ranging from about 4.5 to 7 oocytes per cycle. Existing evidence suggests that previous ovarian surgery for endometriosis negatively affects oocyte yield for FP, but long-term reproductive outcomes remain insufficiently characterized. Such data would be required to enable a more accurate assessment of FP effectiveness. The available evidence indicates that FP counselling should be individualized, with particular emphasis on women with diminished ovarian reserve, age >35 years, or planned bilateral or repeated ovarian surgery.

Indexed as

EndometriomaOvarian reserveReproductive intentionsSurgery for endometriosis

Identifiers

PMID42018222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.