ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
Individualized fertility preservation counselling for women with endometriosis-a systematic review.
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic disease that may require surgical intervention under certain circumstances. Although the condition itself is associated with impaired fertility in 30-50% of affected individuals, surgical treatment may further reduce ovarian reserve and thereby additionally compromise fertility. As fertility preservation (FP) is increasingly being considered in this context, a clear understanding of how ovarian surgery affects the remaining follicle reserve and the outcome of oocyte cryopreservation is essential to guide counselling on the appropriate timing. The purpose of this study is to summarize the available evidence on the impact of ovarian surgery on oocyte retrieval outcomes in the context of FP and to propose a counselling framework based on these findings. The search of electronic databases identified seven observational studies on this topic. In terms of oocyte cryopreservation outcomes, the included studies consistently reported a decrease in the total number of oocytes retrieved in cases of previous surgery for endometriosis. Reported mean or median oocyte numbers ranged approximately from 8 to 14 per cycle in non-operated patients, with significantly lower yields in previously operated women ranging from about 4.5 to 7 oocytes per cycle. Existing evidence suggests that previous ovarian surgery for endometriosis negatively affects oocyte yield for FP, but long-term reproductive outcomes remain insufficiently characterized. Such data would be required to enable a more accurate assessment of FP effectiveness. The available evidence indicates that FP counselling should be individualized, with particular emphasis on women with diminished ovarian reserve, age >35 years, or planned bilateral or repeated ovarian surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42018222What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.