ReviewIET systems biology
Exploring the Power of Machine Learning in Analysing Protein-Protein Sequences.
Review in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examine neural network models for protein sequencing based features prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Splicing as an integrative layer linking cell cycle regulation, epigenetic dynamics, and environmental responses in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins are fundamental biological macromolecules responsible for regulating nearly all cellular processes, and their functions are largely determined by the underlying amino acid sequences. Understanding the relationship between protein sequences and their structural and functional properties remains a major challenge in molecular biology. Although experimental techniques provide accurate insights, they are often time-consuming and expensive, which has led to increasing reliance on computational approaches for protein sequence analysis and structure prediction. Numerous techniques-including homology modelling, machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing and other artificial intelligence methods-have been developed for analysing protein sequences and predicting protein-protein interactions. However, the rapidly growing number of computational methods makes it difficult for researchers to systematically evaluate and select suitable approaches for specific biological applications. This study presents a comprehensive review of recent computational techniques for protein sequence analysis, focusing on machine learning- and deep learning-based frameworks used for predicting protein structure and interactions. This review systematically categorises existing approaches based on their methodological foundations, datasets and performance characteristics and provides a comparative discussion of their advantages and limitations. Furthermore, this study highlights current research gaps, challenges in large-scale protein analysis and emerging trends in AI-driven protein modelling. The findings of this review provide a structured reference for researchers and practitioners, facilitating the selection of appropriate computational techniques and supporting future advancements in protein sequence analysis, disease research and drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.