Trial reportEBioMedicine2026
Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell infusion for frailty: a phase 2, single-centre, randomised, open-label controlled trial.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty syndrome in older adults is a growing public health concern associated with increased vulnerability and adverse outcomes. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) therapy shows promise in improving physical function and quality of life. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous UC-MSC infusion in older frail adults.
methodsA phase 2 randomised controlled trial at Vinmec Times City International General Hospital (2021-2024) enrolled 147 frail adults aged 60-85 (Modified Fried Criteria ≥3). Participants were randomly assigned to receive two intravenous UC-MSC infusions (1.5 × 10
findingsNo UC-MSC therapy-related SAEs occurred. Twelve mild AEs (headache, dizziness, chest discomfort) resolved spontaneously. At nine months, the UC-MSC group showed higher SPPB scores than controls (least-squares mean difference 1.1 points, 95% CI: 0.6-1.6).
interpretationIn this study, UC-MSC infusion was associated with no safety concerns and was associated with higher SPPB scores than in the control group. These findings provide the necessary rationale and foundation for larger, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trials.
fundingVingroup Joint Stock Company, grant ISC.21.11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.