ArticleNature cancer2026
DeepFAN, a transformer-based model for human-artificial intelligence collaborative assessment of incidental pulmonary nodules in CT scans: a multireader, multicase trial.
Article in Nature cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread adoption of computed tomography has increased the detection of lung nodules. However, deep learning methods for classification of benign and malignant nodules often fail to comprehensively integrate global and local features, and most of these methods have not been validated through clinical trials. Here we developed DeepFAN, a transformer-based model trained on more than 10,000 pathology-confirmed nodules, and conducted a multireader, multicase clinical trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2400084624) to evaluate its efficacy in assisting junior radiologists. DeepFAN achieved diagnostic area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.939 (95% CI 0.930-0.948) on an internal test set and 0.954 (95% CI 0.934-0.973) on a clinical trial dataset involving 400 cases across three independent medical institutions. Explainability analysis indicated higher contributions from global than local features. The average performance of 12 readers improved significantly: by 10.9% (95% CI 8.3-13.5%) for AUC, 10.0% (95% CI 8.9-11.1%) for accuracy, 7.6% (95% CI 6.1-9.2%) for sensitivity and 12.6% (95% CI 10.9-14.3%) for specificity (all P < 0.001). Nodule-level interreader diagnostic consistency improved from fair to moderate (overall κ: 0.313 versus 0.421; P = 0.019). These results indicate that DeepFAN can effectively assist junior radiologists and could help to homogenize diagnostic quality and reduce unnecessary follow-up of patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42020549What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.