ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Molecular detection of Anaplasma species in blood and ticks from wild ruminants in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Detection of Anaplasma spp. in Horses From Golestan Province, Northern Iran.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne pathogens pose significant threats to wildlife health and may serve as sources of zoonotic infections. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of Anaplasma spp., particularly Anaplasma ovis, in blood and tick samples from wild goats (Capra hircus aegagrus) and Caspian red deer (Cervus elaphus maral) in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. A total number of 135 ticks and 59 blood samples were collected from live-captured and deceased animals. Molecular detection was initially performed using PCR to identify the genus Anaplasma. Subsequently, gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were conducted to determine the species Anaplasma. Positive blood samples were examined microscopically with Giemsa-stained smears. Key findings: In ticks from wild goats, A. ovis positivity was 6.52% and Anaplasma spp. 9.78%; corresponding rates in ticks from red deer were 4.65% and 6.98%. Blood samples were positive for A. ovis only in wild goats (11.11% prevalence), with all red deer blood samples negative. Anaplasma ovis DNA was detected in blood from one deceased wild goat, but this does not imply causality with mortality, given the typically mild nature of infections. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed strain identities and relationships with known sequences. These descriptive results revealed apparently higher detection rates in wild goats compared to red deer, suggesting species-specific differences in exposure or susceptibility. This study highlighted the role of wild goats as potential reservoirs of A. ovis in the region. This study highlighted the need for systematic surveillance of tick-borne pathogens in Iranian wildlife populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.