ReviewJournal of neuroinflammation2026
Microbiota as a regulator of brain vulnerability across lifespan and disease contexts.
Review in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota influences brain health through inflammatory and metabolic pathways that regulate neurological vulnerability rather than directly causing specific diseases. This framework positions altered microbial composition as one among many environmental factors that modulate brain resilience across aging and disease contexts. Chronic low-grade inflammation driven by compositional and functional changes in the gut microbiota, intestinal barrier dysfunction, and alterations in bacterial metabolites contributes to systemic immune activation, affecting blood-brain barrier integrity, microglial function, and neuronal stress responses. These mechanisms operate across neurodegeneration, viral-associated cognitive decline, and brain tumor progression without constituting primary disease triggers. Aging amplifies microbiota-mediated inflammatory effects through progressive loss of microbial diversity and increased intestinal permeability. Evidence demonstrates associations between altered microbial composition and brain pathology, though these relationships reflect shared inflammatory pathways rather than direct microbial causation and are substantially confounded by diet, medication use, geographic variation, and disease-related behavioral changes. The vulnerability threshold framework proposed here is distinct from multi-hit models: rather than constituting an independent pathogenic insult, microbiota-derived signals modulate the quantitative threshold at which a given level of neurological stress produces clinical disease expression. This vulnerability-threshold model generates testable predictions: microbiota normalization should delay but not prevent neurodegeneration in high-genetic-risk individuals, and the severity of microbiota-associated inflammatory burden should predict the rate of progression rather than disease identity, predictions that longitudinal intervention trials can now begin to test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.