ReviewClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Electroencephalography in stroke Care: From acute monitoring to Post-Stroke epilepsy.
Review in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information for the management of adult stroke patients. However, its integration into routine clinical practice remains variable. During the acute phase, routine and continuous EEG (cEEG) allow the detection of nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus (SE), especially in patients exhibiting impaired consciousness. Rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns, such as lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs), and early epileptiform abnormalities are associated with adverse outcomes and an increased risk of acute seizures. Quantitative EEG (QEEG) metrics, including alpha-delta ratio and asymmetry indices, have the potential to identify emerging ischemia and contribute to the prognostication of functional recovery. In the subacute and chronic stages, EEG assists in identifying patients at increased risk of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). As such, EEG can enhance stratification and informs long-term management strategies alongside validated risk scores such as SeLECT, IsCHEMiA and CAVE. In the long term, serial EEG and QEEG assessments can guide the titration of antiseizure medications (ASMs), detect subclinical epileptiform activity associated with PSE and monitor recovery trajectories. Despite these contributions, evidence for EEG-guided interventions is limited, with variability in methodology, populations and protocols. Key gaps include lack of standardized strategies, limited outcome-related data and underrepresented groups. Future work should focus on multicenter trials, biomarker validation, and cost-effectiveness to clarify the role of EEG in stroke care. This review consolidates available evidence and highlights unmet needs in EEG use during stroke management, offering practical advice for clinicians and suggesting future research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.