ArticleArtificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)2025
Utility of Deep Learning to Address Missing Modalities from Multi-Modal Medical Imaging Studies: A Systematic Review.
Article in Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missing modalities pose a significant challenge on multi-modal studies by disrupting the comprehensive analysis of diverse data sources. Deep learning addresses this issue by employing algorithms that can effectively infer and integrate the absent information, thereby ensuring robustness and accuracy of the models while increasing the study's statistical power. This study aims to provide a systematic literature review on deep learning solutions for missing imaging modalities in multi-modal medical data analysis. Articles on PubMed, IEEE explore digital library, and Scopus were searched in the range from January 2013 to May 2025. This systematic search and review identified 234 articles. Adhering to the specified search criteria, 61 published studies were eligible. Among these, 47% employed image synthesis methods, 20% applied knowledge transfer methods, and 33% used latent feature space-based methods. The paper explores the research gaps and challenges associated within each of these categories. Additionally, this review paper illuminates the popular public datasets for multi-modal studies with missing modalities. Furthermore, it presents evaluation metrics and their key attributes. The review concludes with its limitations and a detailed discussion of current challenges and future directions in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.