Trial reportSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2026
[A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Acupuncture at the Sphenopalatine Ganglion for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis].
Trial report in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: A randomized controlled trial design was used. A total of 120 patients with AR were randomly assigned in a 1∶1 ratio to either the experimental group (acupuncture on the SPG, twice a week for 2 weeks) or the control group (oral lupatadine fumarate tablets, 10 mg daily for 2 weeks). The primary outcome measures were nasal symptom and sign scores at 1 and 2 weeks after treatment. Secondary outcome measures included the total non-nasal symptom score (TNNSS) and the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) score. Results: Four cases were excluded from both the experimental group and the control group. Ultimately, 56 cases in each group completed the study. After two weeks of treatment, the total effective rates were 82.1% for the experimental group and 87.5% for the control group, with no statistically significant difference. At each time point after treatment, the symptom scores, sign scores, TNNSS, and RQLQ scores in both groups decreased compared to baseline, and these differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: Acupuncture on the SPG and oral administration of lupatadine fumarate can both effectively alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life for patients with AR. The overall short-term efficacy is comparable. However, acupuncture on the SPG is more effective in relieving nasal congestion and has a good safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.