ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Food's future: sustainability and agricultural robotics.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our global food system faces growing challenges such as population growth, climate change, resource constraints, and food loss. This set of threats has begun to erode the stability of food security efforts and challenge the long-term sustainability goals outlined by global organizations. To respond effectively, the sector needs concrete and forward-looking innovations that reflect the objectives of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations (UN), especially the commitment in Goal 2 to eliminate hunger. In this study, we examine how agricultural robotics can support the shift toward more resilient and sustainable food systems, particularly in areas where classical methods are under strain. It brings together perspectives from technology, sustainability, and policy, aiming to bridge broad global priorities with everyday realities faced in local contexts. To structure the discussion in a concise way, our analysis is framed around five different, yet interrelated, dimensions. First, we use a crisis-framing perspective to explain why food system reform has become urgent and to show how these pressures align with key SDG priorities. The second dimension outlines a simple taxonomy that groups agricultural robots according to their domain and intended function while also highlighting ongoing technical issues such as interoperability. The next dimension examines how robotics is being amalgamated with precision farming tools, Internet of Things (IoT) platforms, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data systems. Collectively, these technologies facilitate more autonomous field operations and support faster, data-driven decision making. The sustainability dimension evaluates how these technologies affect environmental, economic, and social outcomes in the agricultural sector. This comprehensive review highlights several potential advantages, such as reduced chemical inputs, improved water efficiency, improvements in soil quality, more efficient use of labor, and new employment opportunities in rural and remote areas. In the final dimension, this study turns to global case studies, drawing comparative insights between developed nations such as Australia and the United States, and emerging economies including Brazil, India, and China. Across these diverse contexts, agricultural robotics consistently demonstrate the capacity to boost productivity, reduce waste, and make more efficient use of resources. It is apparent that these gains extend beyond the farm, contributing to environmental stewardship and broader socio-economic development. Yet, the path to widespread adoption is far from straightforward. Farmers and policymakers alike confront persistent barriers: the high upfront costs of robotic systems, gaps in technical expertise, difficulties in ensuring interoperability across platforms, and pressing ethical questions around data governance and automation. Overcoming these challenges is not simply a technical exercise; it is a prerequisite for realizing the full promise of robotics in reshaping global food systems for a more sustainable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.