ArticleClinical and experimental hepatology2025
Pemafibrate as a therapeutic option for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease resistant to dietary intervention.
Article in Clinical and experimental hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the study: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a lifestyle-related disease. However, many patients appear resistant to treatment despite dietary counseling. Pemafibrate is a novel lipidlowering pharmaceutical agent that was developed as a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator. The present study aimed to clarify the efficacy of pemafibrate in diet-resistant MASLD patients with persistent hyperlipidemia. Material and methods: Participants comprised 91 MASLD patients with persistent alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation and hyperlipidemia despite counseling on moderate-carbohydrate restriction (150-200 g/day) for more than one year, who received pemafibrate (0.2 mg/day) for 6 months. Complete response (CR) was defined as ALT normalization (≤ 33 IU/l in males, ≤ 25 IU/l in females). Partial response (PR) was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in ALT level from baseline, without achieving CR. No response (NR) was defined as achieving neither CR nor PR. Dietary counseling was maintained every 3 months throughout pemafibrate treatment. Results: CR, PR, and NR rates were 40% (36/91), 24% (22/91), and 36% (33/91), respectively. The response rate (CR + PR) was 64%. Although no significant change in body weight was observed, significant reductions were seen in lipid profiles (including triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and liver enzymes (including ALT, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase). The concentration of glycosylated isomers of Mac-2-binding protein was significantly reduced, but no significant change in liver shear wave velocity was observed. Conclusions: Pemafibrate may be a potential second-line therapeutic option for diet-resistant MASLD patients with hyperlipidemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.