ArticleHealth science reports2026
Assessment of Quality of Care Provided for Patients Receiving Post-Myocardial Infarction Care at Selected Cardiac Clinics in Sulaymaniyah: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to global projections, by the year 2050, ischemic heart disease will remain the leading cause of cardiovascular deaths with hypertension as a leading modifiable risk factor for mortality. Improving quality care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with improved outcomes. Aims: There is inadequate evidence on the quality of post-MI care. This study assessed the quality of post-MI care at selected cardiac clinics in Sulaymaniyah. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among cardiac clinics managing acute and chronic coronary artery disease in Sulaymaniyah from February to March 2025. Data entry, processing, and analysis were performed via SPSS version 24.0. Results: In total, 23 patients receiving post-MI follow-up care were included. The mean age of participants was 61 ± 11.31 years. Concerning the quality of post-MI care, 52.8% had a good quality of care. None of the patients were receiving low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg) for inflammation reduction. One-fourth 6 (26.1%) of patients were taking medications for mental health disorders. Having comorbid hypertension [AOR = 0.1016 (95% CI = 0.0138-0.747, Conclusion: The quality of care provided to post-MI patients was low. Post-MI patient care should be comprehensive enough to address the holistic needs of patients to improve their longevity and quality of life. Addressing associated factors by involving all relevant stakeholders is important to improve the quality of care provided to post-MI patients. Future research that considers regional coverage is needed to determine the true picture of post-MI quality care and determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.