ReviewHealth science reports2026
Comparing Teriparatide and Bisphosphonates for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a bone disorder highly prevalent in post-menopausal women and is an important predisposing factor towards bone fractures. It is commonly classified based on BMD, which is estimated via DEXA scan. It is an important issue worldwide and requires a multidisciplinary approach to be controlled. Methods: Utilizing online sources including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, a thorough literature search was conducted. To determine the best treatment options with fewer difficulties and adverse events and more good results. There were discovered to be 15 RCTS that qualified. The study was carried out per PRISMA recommendations. Results: According to the outcomes generated from the study, there was a significantly reduced rate of overall vertebral and non-vertebral fractures with teriparatide use along with data supporting increased BMD observed in the teriparatide group. Importantly, there was a reduction in death rate too observed in the intervention group. The results were also consistent with our various secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We can conclude from the outcomes that a clinically significant result was generated in the group using teriparatide in various aspects. There were still some confounding factors present that need to be addressed to increase the yield of the study, and with increasing research in the field, more comprehensive studies are required in the future to reach a definitive outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.