Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022682›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2026

Comparing Teriparatide and Bisphosphonates for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

Marha Zaheer Uddin, Hira Hameed, Anoosha Muhammad Iqbal, Muhamad Irfan, Sanhia Maheshwari, Komal Khan, Shafin Bin Amin, Syed Ali Arsal, Ashish Kumar, Umer Iqbal and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marha Zaheer UddinDepartment of Medicine Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi Pakistan.
Hira HameedDepartment of Medicine Jinnah Hospital, Lahore Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5247-0177
Anoosha Muhammad IqbalDepartment of Medicine Dow Medical College Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Pakistan.
Muhamad IrfanDepartment of Medicine Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Karachi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8319-028X
Sanhia MaheshwariDepartment of Medicine Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4201-7492
Komal KhanDepartment of Medicine Ziauddin University Karachi City Sindh Pakistan.
Shafin Bin AminDepartment of Medicine Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi Pakistan.
Syed Ali ArsalDepartment of Medicine Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Karachi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8665-4288
Ashish KumarDepartment of Medicine Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Karachi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-4050
Umer IqbalDepartment of Medicine Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Karachi Pakistan.
Muhammad MaazDepartment of Medicine Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Karachi Pakistan.
Inibehe Ime OkonDepartment of Research Medical Research Circle (MedReC) Bukavu DR Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8275-5713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a bone disorder highly prevalent in post-menopausal women and is an important predisposing factor towards bone fractures. It is commonly classified based on BMD, which is estimated via DEXA scan. It is an important issue worldwide and requires a multidisciplinary approach to be controlled. Methods: Utilizing online sources including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, a thorough literature search was conducted. To determine the best treatment options with fewer difficulties and adverse events and more good results. There were discovered to be 15 RCTS that qualified. The study was carried out per PRISMA recommendations. Results: According to the outcomes generated from the study, there was a significantly reduced rate of overall vertebral and non-vertebral fractures with teriparatide use along with data supporting increased BMD observed in the teriparatide group. Importantly, there was a reduction in death rate too observed in the intervention group. The results were also consistent with our various secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We can conclude from the outcomes that a clinically significant result was generated in the group using teriparatide in various aspects. There were still some confounding factors present that need to be addressed to increase the yield of the study, and with increasing research in the field, more comprehensive studies are required in the future to reach a definitive outcome.

Indexed as

bisphosphonatemeta‐analysispost‐menopausal osteoporosisteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID42022682
PMCPMC13097435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.