ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Risk factors for adjacent vertebral fracture after PVP in patients with OVCF.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify the risk factors and evaluate the predictive performance for adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) after Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Methods: In this retrospective study, 429 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent initial single-level PVP at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into an AVF group ( Results: Univariate analysis indicated that the AVF group was significantly older (76.357 ± 7.698 vs. 72.608 ± 9.024 years, Conclusion: Advanced age and low bone mineral density are independent risk factors for AVF after PVP, with OR = 1.045 per year of age and OR = 2.85 per SD decrease in BMD T-score. Although the predictive value of individual indicators is limited (AUC < 0.7), a comprehensive model (AUC = 0.706) achieves moderate accuracy suitable for preliminary risk stratification, supporting the prioritization of systemic osteoporosis management over surgical technical details in prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.