ArticleTree physiology2026
Volatile cues from pathogenic, mutualistic and saprotrophic fungi cause specific, fungus-dependent responses in poplar.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants are exposed to complex interactions with belowground organisms, yet how they differentiate between mutualistic and pathogenic fungi before physical contact remains largely unknown. We exposed the roots of young Populus × canescens (Aiton) Sm. plants to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by fungi with contrasting lifestyles: the pathogenic Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref., the saprotrophPostia placenta (Fr.) M.J. Larsen & Lombard and the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor (Maire) P.D. Orton. Volatile organic compound analysis of the shared rhizosphere headspace and leaf emissions revealed that poplar plants could perceive and respond to fungal identity solely through airborne cues. The root-zone headspace contained fungus-specific sesquiterpene fingerprints that remained similar after 3 and 6 weeks of co-cultivation: Pathogen-derived VOCs induced constantly high sesquiterpene emissions from the root-zone, whereas mycorrhizal VOCs caused low but targeted emissions of specific sesquiterpenes. In contrast, saprotrophic VOCs caused a temporal shift in root-zone VOC pattern, with increased sesquiterpene emissions after 6 weeks. Fungal VOC exposure also altered leaf VOC emissions, enriching alkanes, esters and monoterpenes. Initially, leaf VOC emissions were fungal lifestyle-specific but they converged over time, indicating systemic signal integration of belowground signals. These findings demonstrate that trees can discriminate 'friend-versus-foe' through VOCs alone, extending pattern-recognition theory beyond contact-dependent cues. Multivariate analyses suggested organ-specific chemical strategies: roots function as chemosensors decoding fungal volatilomes, while systemic adjustments shape aboveground VOC profiles. Understanding the plant response to fungal VOCs may offer potential for developing early pathogen diagnostics and further elucidate the volatile-mediated plant-fungal interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.