SynthesisCurrent nutrition reports2026
"It's No Choking Matter!": The Search for Evidence Relating to Home-Delivered, Texture-Modified Meals - A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewHome-delivered meals have been shown to confer benefits conducive to successfully ageing in place. However, little is known about home-delivered, texture-modified meals designed for older community-dwelling people with dysphagia, despite recognition that such individuals are at significant nutritional risk. The purpose of this review is therefore to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesise any existing evidence relating to home-delivered, texture-modified meals for community-dwelling persons with dysphagia. RECENT
findingsA systematic search of the literature was performed across five relevant databases (CINAHL, Medline, Pub Med, Scopus, and Web of Science) to answer the research question, “What is currently known about home-delivered, texture-modified meals for community-dwelling individuals with dysphagia?”. Broad inclusion criteria and minimal limits were applied. Articles were included if they reported upon any outcomes specific to home-delivered, texture-modified meals. Following removal of duplicates, 521 articles were subjected to screening by title and abstract, and 40 to full-text review. No studies of specific relevance to the research question were returned. The findings of this systematic literature review indicate a true gap in the literature and a need to establish a baseline of evidence about home-delivered, texture-modified meals. Doing so will help to ensure that community-dwelling older persons with dysphagia have equitable access to safe and nutritionally adequate meals that support successful ageing in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.