ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
Identifying Breast Cancer Risk in Patients Undergoing Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Breast Cancer Risk in Patients Undergoing Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesBreast cancer risk among transgender and gender-diverse individuals undergoing gender-affirming chest masculinization ("top") surgery remains poorly defined. This study aimed to characterize breast cancer risk and management in this population.
methodsWe conducted retrospective chart review of patients undergoing top surgery within an academic plastic surgery practice. Variables included family and reproductive history, genetic testing, International Breast Intervention Study (IBIS) scores, and final pathology. The primary outcome was elevated breast cancer risk, defined as IBIS ≥ 20% (high risk) or 15%-19% (intermediate). Significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsFrom April 2019 to December 2024, 284 individuals underwent top surgery. One-third reported a family history of breast cancer, and two of fifteen genetically tested patients carried pathogenic variants. IBIS scores were calculable in 79 patients, with 43% demonstrating intermediate or high risk (IBIS ≥ 15%). Seven patients were referred to breast surgical oncology and fifteen to genetics; four high-risk individuals elected risk-reducing mastectomy. One case of ductal carcinoma in situ was identified during risk-reducing mastectomy.
conclusionA subset of top surgery patients exhibit elevated familial, genetic, or IBIS-based breast cancer risk. Although incidental malignancy was rare, structured risk assessment and selective referral may improve screening and management in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.