ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via mHealth Apps in Saudi Arabia: Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arabic Wellness Apps in the MENA Region and Saudi Arabia: Current Evidence and Systematic Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As Saudi Arabia aims to enhance the adoption and utilization of mobile health (mHealth) apps in the health care sector, it is vital to identify the potential challenges that may be faced in the process and how to address them. Objective: This study aimed to explore patients' and stakeholders' perspectives regarding the privacy, security, and confidentiality of data collected via mHealth apps in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A qualitative research design was used by conducting an in-depth interview with 25 participants, comprising health care workers (HCWs), patients, and mHealth app developers. The interview questions focused on awareness of mHealth apps and issues relating to data security, privacy and confidentiality, benefits of mHealth apps, challenges faced, and features that may improve the utilization of such digital health technologies. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software (version 12; QSR International). Results: Patients were relatively less informed regarding events associated with data privacy and security than HCWs. Specific factors were identified to influence patient awareness with HCWs, suggesting the need for patient education and collaboration with cybersecurity organizations. Participants posited that advanced security features, user-friendly features, online consultation for emergencies, remote monitoring features, and taking patient needs into account are important facilitators of mHealth apps. Shared experiences mainly revolved around the accessibility to information and reliability of mHealth apps, while the challenges were related to poor usability, technical difficulties, data security, and data breaches. Patient autonomy, remote monitoring, self-care management, medical adherence, and time and cost-saving summed up the perceived benefits of the mHealth app. Conclusions: These findings may assist policymakers in developing strategies to improve Saudi users' and patients' adoption of mHealth apps and address the concerns raised to benefit significantly from these advanced health care modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.