SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Prevalence of chronic pain in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Chronic pain represents a significant health concern affecting a large segment of society. To date, no systematic review and meta-analysis has evaluated the prevalence of chronic pain in the general population aged 18 to 95 years. The present study aimed to assess prevalence of chronic pain in this age group and examine its variation across age, sex, geographical regions, and psychosocial factors. Methods Cochrane Library, PubMed, and MEDLINE, were searched by combining combination of two categories of keywords (prevalence, chronic pain, epidemiology, population-based study, meta-analysis) in the general population till May 2024. Results A total of 52 studies with 2,89,490 participants were included to ascertain the global prevalence of six types of chronic pain: non-specific chronic pain, fibromyalgia, chronic lower back pain, chronic back pain, chronic widespread pain, and chronic musculoskeletal pain. The overall pooled random-effect prevalence percentage of chronic pain was 26.99%. The chronic pain prevalence percentage was significantly higher in those above 45 yr of age (46.7%), compared to 24.2% in those between 18-45 yr (P<0.001). The prevalence of chronic pain was higher in women as compared to men (31.42% vs. 21.63%) (P=0.07). Interpretation and conclusions The present global meta-analysis of chronic pain across the age group of 18-95 yr, observed a higher prevalence in women and in those alone 45 years of age. There was no geographical difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.