ArticleBiophysical reports2026
Objective clustering protocol for single-molecule data: A lifetime vs. intensity study.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-molecule spectroscopy (SMS) is an exceptionally sensitive technique, but its inherently limited photon budget produces noisy data that can readily lead to subjective analyses, fitting errors, and reduced statistical power, obscuring true subpopulations and their dynamics. Here, we present an unbiased, objective method to cluster two-dimensional single-molecule data and demonstrate it on fluorescence lifetime-intensity correlations. The clustering method is based on Gaussian mixture modeling, with the optimal number of clusters determined through information criteria (the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria and integrated completed likelihood) and supplemented by cluster-quality metrics such as average cluster tightness and the fraction of points outside confidence ellipses, which guide the selection of statistically robust and physically meaningful clusters. The protocol was benchmarked on simulated datasets spanning clean, smeared, and noisy overlap-limited regimes and applied to experimental data from Alexa Fluor 647 and QD605. This approach reliably recovers relevant subpopulations even in the presence of noise and overlapping distributions, providing an objective framework for analyzing single-molecule heterogeneity, with limitations arising primarily under severe geometric overlap or extreme state-occupancy imbalance where distinct populations are no longer separable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.