Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42026354›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2026

Variability of the Immunosuppressive Properties of Glioma Cell Lines.

I V Kholodenko, R Yu Saryglar, A Y Lupatov, K V Kovalskaya, O A Bystrykh, A V Kuprin, K N Yarygin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

I V KholodenkoInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia. irkhol@yandex.ru.
R Yu SaryglarInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
A Y LupatovInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
K V KovalskayaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
O A BystrykhA. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
A V KuprinA. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
K N YaryginInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapeutic methods, such as the use of checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T cells, dendritic cell vaccines, etc., offer promising approach to the treatment of glioblastomas. Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines used in glioma therapy have been well studied and are effective in some cases. However, the use of DC vaccines for the treatment of patients with gliomas, though shows promising results, is still limited by the suboptimal choice of tumor antigen and the method of its loading, as well as the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor cell microenvironment. In this work, we showed that glioma cell lines express a broad spectrum of immune checkpoints, suppress the maturation of allogeneic DCs during direct co-culturing, and do not stimulate the proliferation of allogeneic lymphocytes. Lymphocytes primed with dendritic cells loaded with the corresponding tumor lysates effectively lysed only two of three glioma cell lines, T98G and U373 MG, whereas 1321N1 cells completely suppressed the cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes primed by co-culturing with DCs loaded with the lysate of these cells. Thus, the efficacy of DC vaccines may be related to the individual characteristics of glioma cells.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDendritic CellsGliomaCancer VaccinesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesHumansCancer Vaccinesdendritic cellsglioblastomaglioma cell linesimmunosuppression

Identifiers

PMID42026354

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.