Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2026
Effects of supplementing with Saccharomyces boulardii on vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for naive Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThis randomized controlled trial (RCT) sought to investigate whether Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) can improve the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate and reduce adverse events when added to the vonoprazan–amoxicillin dual therapy—a first-line treatment.
methodsThis is a single-center, prospective RCT. For the VA (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 750 mg three times daily for 10 days) and VAS (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 750 mg three times daily, and S. boulardii 250 mg twice daily for 10 days) groups, 150 eligible patients were recruited between February 2024 and December 2024. The two groups were compared in terms of eradication rates, adverse events, safety, compliance, and eradication rate-related factors.
resultsThe eradication rates of the VA and VAS therapies were 89.3% and 93.3% based on intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.384) and 93.1% and 94.6% based on per-protocol analysis (P = 0.966), respectively. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the VAS group (5.3%) than in the VA group (21.3%; P = 0.004), particularly with regard to abdominal pain (P = 0.020). There was no significant difference in compliance between the VA (96.0%) and VAS groups (98.7%, P = 0.612). Body surface area (BSA) was an influencing factor for the eradication rate in both groups. Liver and kidney functions in both groups before and after the therapy did not change significantly.
conclusionAdding S. boulardii to the VA-dual therapy may reduce the occurrence of adverse effects but may not improve the eradication rate. Low-BSA patients are more suitable candidates for this regimen.
trial registrationThe study protocol received approval and was subsequently registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300075347). The registration was completed on 1 September 2023, and the publicly accessible record can be found at https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.