ArticleBMC public health2026
Exploring the factors influencing loss to follow up among patients living with HIV& AIDS on antiretroviral therapy in the Northern Region of Ghana: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoss to follow-up among people living with HIV remains a major challenge to the success of antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Although antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved survival and quality of life, sustained engagement in care is threatened by complex individual, social, and health system factors. Understanding these factors within specific contexts is essential for developing effective interventions. This study explored the factors influencing Loss to follow-up among people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in the Northern Region of Ghana.
methodsA qualitative study design using phenomenological approach was employed. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 participants, ( 28 people living with HIV and 10 healthcare providers), purposively selected from antiretroviral therapy clinic of the Tamale Teaching Hospital. Interviews were conducted in English and Dagbani, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework. Trustworthiness was ensured through strategies addressing credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability.
resultsThree major themes emerged. Individual-level factors influencing loss to follow-up included transportation and financial constraints, marital status, and personal beliefs or misconceptions about HIV. Facility-related factors influencing loss to follow-up comprised drug stock-outs, negative staff attitudes, and structural challenges such as inadequate privacy. Social and community-level factors influencing loss to follow-up included stigma, and cultural and religious beliefs.
conclusionLoss to follow-up among people living with HIV in Northern Ghana is a multidimensional phenomenon shaped by interconnected socio-economic, cultural, and health system factors. Addressing Loss to follow-up therefore requires integrated, context-sensitive strategies that go beyond biomedical care. Specifically, strengthening antiretroviral therapy supply chains and implementing patient-centred service delivery models, such as reduced waiting times, are critical to improving trust and continuity of care. In addition, structured stigma-reduction initiatives, including training for healthcare workers and active engagement with community, religious, and traditional leaders, are essential to address socio-cultural barriers and misconceptions surrounding HIV. Such approaches are crucial for improving retention in HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.