ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
A Network Analysis of Social Integration and Subjective Well-Being in Young and Middle-Aged Lymphoma Patients.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Relationship Among Pain, Intrinsic Capacity, and Fear of Movement in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Moderated Network Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the network relationships between social integration and subjective well-being (SWB) and to identify key nodes within this network among young and middle-aged lymphoma patients. Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary cancer hospital in Urumqi, Xinjiang, China. From February to November 2025, a total of 315 young and middle-aged lymphoma patients were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were collected via a general information questionnaire, the Social Cohesion Scale, and the General Well-Being Schedule. We used network analysis to identify core and bridge nodes in the social integration and SWB network. A network comparison test (NCT) was performed to examine potential gender differences. Results: The network analysis revealed that "Daily integration" demonstrated the strongest edge weight with "Relaxed or tense". In terms of node centrality, "Depressed or happy mood" and "Daily integration" emerged as the core nodes with the highest strength centrality, while "Daily integration" and "Intimate integration" were identified as the pivotal bridge nodes connecting different network clusters. No gender differences were observed in the association network between social integration and SWB. Conclusion: This study explores the network associations between social integration and SWB in young and middle-aged lymphoma patients. The findings suggest that intervention strategies may focus on improving emotional regulation, daily social interaction, and intimate relationships to enhance social integration and SWB in this population. Given the heterogeneity in clinical characteristics among lymphoma patients, future studies are warranted to validate the present findings across different subtypes and treatment backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.