Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42027613›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Implementing Title X: policy design, administration, and geographic access to care.

Tracee M Saunders, Kellen A Kane, Candis Watts Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tracee M SaundersDepartment of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5925-7596
Kellen A KaneLyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-4593
Candis Watts SmithDepartment of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8370-5628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Title X of the Public Health Service Act is a critical federal program-the only one dedicated exclusively to providing affordable, confidential, evidence-based reproductive health care to low-income populations, yet its capacity to fulfill this mandate depends on political, administrative, and fiscal decisions made across multiple levels of governance-from Congress and federal regulators to state and regional grantees and their sub-grantee clinic networks. Methods: This study assesses geographic access to Title X-funded clinics across all 50 states and the District of Columbia in 2024, a period with significant program and regulatory disruption. Using the Integrated Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (I2SFCA) method-which employs road-network-based drive time thresholds calibrated to urban-rural context-applied to 2024 clinic locations and census-tract-level demographic data, we identify a confluence of spatial and nonspatial barriers to Title X. Results: Findings reveal widespread and substantial gaps in geographic access, a challenge faced by people across all racial groups, rural and urban residents, and individuals with low incomes. Conclusion: These findings offer a precise geographic account of where Title X's reach falls shortest-documenting the ramifications of policy retrenchment and establishing a baseline against which future policy changes can be measured.

Indexed as

contraception desertscontraceptive accessfamily planningfederal fundinggeographic accessreproductive health equityTitle Xtwo-step floating catchment area

Identifiers

PMID42027613
PMCPMC13101994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.