ArticleDigital health
Bridging digital health gaps in South Africa: A qualitative study of the digital divide, interoperability and health equity.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates how the interplay between the digital divide and limited interoperability in healthcare technologies contributes to regional disparities in healthcare access and outcomes in South Africa. It further examines how digital health systems might be leveraged to reduce inequities and promote more inclusive development. Methods: The research draws on qualitative interviews with clinicians, digital health experts, policymakers, and implementers across public and private sectors. Data were analysed thematically, with attention to structural conditions shaping digital readiness, institutional capacity, information flow, and user experience across provinces. Results: Findings suggest that structural barriers, such as uneven broadband access, outdated infrastructure, staff shortages and institutional fragmentation, interact with weak interoperability to produce inconsistent digital health experiences. These constraints limit continuity of care, restrict patient mobility across systems and contribute to the existing disparities between better-resourced and under-resourced regions. Participants emphasised that digital tools alone cannot deliver equitable outcomes without coordinated governance, national digital public infrastructure, and sustained organisational readiness. Conclusion: Digital transformation will only advance equity when digital access, interoperability and institutional capacity are addressed as interdependent system-level requirements. Strengthening national digital infrastructure and governance is essential to ensuring that digital health technologies narrow, rather than reproduce, existing inequalities, including persistent regional disparities that manifest within the broader national system. Sustained national investment in digital governance and shared infrastructure is indispensable to ensuring that digital health systems mitigate rather than reinforce deep-seated inequities. Embedding equity in the design and implementation of digital health initiatives is essential for translating technological progress into inclusive health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.