ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Dementia screening protocol for primary care in South America: a Delphi consensus study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validity of the two different scoring methods of the Clinical Dementia Rating scale in staging and detection of cognitive impairment in the Peruvian population.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid population aging in South America (SA) highlights the need for effective dementia detection strategies. Primary care is essential for early identification, yet no shared, regionally contextualized approach exists. This study aimed to develop expert-based recommendations for dementia screening in SA primary care. Methods: A two-round modified Delphi process involved 20 SA experts from different specialties. Round 1 explored open-ended and ranking questions on cognitive and functional screening tools, cut-offs, referral criteria, administration time, and professional roles. Round 2 sought consensus (≥75%) on items informed by Round 1. Results: Consensus was reached on using an initial screening question to identify potential cognitive decline, the duration of a brief screening battery, and the primary care team's roles. Experts emphasized the need for educational, cultural, and sensory adaptations and proposed strategies for patients without reliable informants. An agreement on functional assessment tools and some cut-off points was not achieved. Discussion: These recommendations provide a structured, flexible, and culturally sensitive framework for primary care dementia screening, supporting timely detection, timely referral and integration into person-centered approaches to healthy aging, while highlighting areas requiring further research and standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.