ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Neuromodulation approaches and applications in the management of post-stroke pain: a comprehensive review.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Post-stroke pain (PSP) remains a common and profoundly debilitating consequence of stroke, both in terms of a delay in recovery and in substantially reducing quality of life. Both invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are increasingly being explored as possible treatment modalities for various forms of PSP. This literature review examines the current body of evidence for all forms of neurostimulation for PSP. Methods: In this paper, we provide a review of the most recent literature exploring neuromodulation for PSP, covering several key domains: an examination of various PSP subtypes and the underlying mechanisms; a consolidation to date of the literature examining both invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques for forms of PSP, and a discussion of future directions for the field. Results: The impact of neuromodulation techniques on PSP populations, focusing primarily on spasticity and central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is discussed. Conclusion: To varying degrees, numerous invasive and non-invasive modalities are beginning to be explored for individuals suffering from PSP. While preliminary, there is promising evidence to suggest that neuromodulatory techniques may reduce or ameliorate PSP. Further evidence and large clinical trials are needed to compare these treatments to the standard of care, as well as each other, to optimize outcomes for patients. In a rapidly evolving field, this review helps to provide the current state of neuromodulation in research on PSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.