Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42028220›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

Neuromodulation approaches and applications in the management of post-stroke pain: a comprehensive review.

Stewart S Cox, Marion Wood, Falon Sutton, Katherine Tucker, Nicole Cash, Ruxue Gong, Nathan C Rowland, Steven A Kautz, Mark S George, Jeffrey J Borckardt and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stewart S CoxDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Marion WoodDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Falon SuttonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Katherine TuckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Nicole CashDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Ruxue GongDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Nathan C RowlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Steven A KautzDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Mark S GeorgeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Jeffrey J BorckardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Xiaolong PengDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Funding

Understanding the Mechanistic, Neurophysiological, and Antinociceptive Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation for Treatment of Chronic PainRM1NS128787 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI Jeffrey J Borckardt, Kathryn A. Cunningham · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
Neuro-PRECISE Center: Research ProjectP50HD118628 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI STEVEN A. KAUTZ · 2025 to 2026
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD118628NINDS NIH HHS RM1 NS128787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Post-stroke pain (PSP) remains a common and profoundly debilitating consequence of stroke, both in terms of a delay in recovery and in substantially reducing quality of life. Both invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are increasingly being explored as possible treatment modalities for various forms of PSP. This literature review examines the current body of evidence for all forms of neurostimulation for PSP. Methods: In this paper, we provide a review of the most recent literature exploring neuromodulation for PSP, covering several key domains: an examination of various PSP subtypes and the underlying mechanisms; a consolidation to date of the literature examining both invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques for forms of PSP, and a discussion of future directions for the field. Results: The impact of neuromodulation techniques on PSP populations, focusing primarily on spasticity and central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is discussed. Conclusion: To varying degrees, numerous invasive and non-invasive modalities are beginning to be explored for individuals suffering from PSP. While preliminary, there is promising evidence to suggest that neuromodulatory techniques may reduce or ameliorate PSP. Further evidence and large clinical trials are needed to compare these treatments to the standard of care, as well as each other, to optimize outcomes for patients. In a rapidly evolving field, this review helps to provide the current state of neuromodulation in research on PSP.

Indexed as

central post-stroke paindeep-brain stimulationneuromodulationpost-stroke paintranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42028220
PMCPMC13099307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.