Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42029173›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative effectiveness research2026

Maximizing the impact of real-world evidence on cancer treatment: what do we need to achieve it?

Begoña Bermejo, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Meritxell Bellet, Susana de la Cruz, Elena Galve-Calvo, Verónica Obadia, Ana Santaballa, Rocío Ramos-Medina, Mónica Cuenca, Fernando Moreno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Begoña BermejoMedical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia; Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-5994
Rodrigo DienstmannOncology Data Science, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5997-318X
Meritxell BelletOncology Department, Breast Cancer Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8859-8307
Susana de la CruzMedical Oncology Department, Navarra University Hospital - IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0001-6893-6628
Elena Galve-CalvoOncologia Médica. Hospital Universitario Basurto (OSI Bilbao-Basurto); Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4204-5736
Verónica ObadiaOncology Department, Breast Cancer Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9886-2626
Ana SantaballaMedical Oncology Department, La Fe Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7763-320X
Rocío Ramos-MedinaMedical Department, Pfizer Oncology, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-4152
Mónica CuencaMedical Department, Pfizer Oncology, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-6472-5359
Fernando MorenoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-0687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing number of studies using real-world data to examine outcomes of drugs in clinical practice. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully evaluate their quality and findings, extract valuable insights, acknowledge their limitations and identify gaps to advance further their use in decision-making. Here we provide an overview of the opportunities offered throughout drug lifecycle, and challenges presented by real-world evidence (RWE) studies. We also highlight the importance of the culture of transparency, along with the development of good practices for reporting RWE studies. In addition, we review common biases and other methodological aspects that can undermine the potential insights a real-world oncology study can provide. We briefly illustrate some questions that RWE studies address that can help us guide clinical decisions. Several possible future directions expected to contribute for RWE improving cancer patients' outcomes emerge, from prospective data collection initiatives to normalization of biomarker data integration or collaborative data sharing platforms.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsEvidence-Based MedicineNeoplasmsBiasHumansResearch DesignAntineoplastic Agentsbiasfit-for-usereal-world datareal-world evidencetransparency

Identifiers

PMID42029173
PMCPMC13154927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.