ArticleActa psychologica2026
Modeling human synchronization to rhythmic patterns with varying statistical regularities.
Article in Acta psychologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to learn and adapt to new temporal regularities is pivotal to successfully interact with our environment. Research on rhythm processing has identified which features boost the learning of new rhythmic patterns and facilitate predictive behaviors, such as motor synchronization to them. How do humans learn to synchronize with new temporal patterns when these lack strong rhythmicity and predictability? Here we hypothesized that optimal synchronization with such patterns would require a probabilistic form of associative learning. In our experiment participants tapped a finger in synchrony with an auditory stream in which a familiar and a novel pattern alternated. The two patterns were made of the same intervals but arranged in reversed order, thus having different structures. Within the stream, the two patterns occurred with complementary probabilities, following a gradual transition from familiar to novel pattern across trials. We modelled synchronization performances as the result of a Bayesian inference process parameterized by a Rescorla-Wagner learning rule. Results showed that participants learned to synchronize to the novel pattern only when its predictability clearly exceeded that of the old one, i.e., a few trials after the actual transition in the patterns' probabilities. Parameter estimation makes us hypothesize two learning strategies to be tested in future work. On the one hand, "fast learners" may quickly learn to synchronize to each pattern and adapt to changes between them across trials. On the other hand, "slow learners" may slowly learn to synchronize to a pattern and fail to fully adjust to a novel one. Overall, our results provide preliminary evidence that probabilistic associative learning may offer a parsimonious account for how individuals learn to synchronize with new, variably predictable temporal patterns. This learning could be modulated by subject-specific strategies to adapt to rhythmic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.