Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42030817›Full record

ArticleActa psychologica2026

Modeling human synchronization to rhythmic patterns with varying statistical regularities.

Dunia Giomo, Federico Mancinelli, Andrea Ravignani, Domenica Bueti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dunia GiomoInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: dunia.giomo@uniroma1.it.
Federico MancinelliInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy; University of Bonn, Transdisciplinary Research Area "Life & Health", Hertz Chair for Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, Bonn, Germany.
Andrea RavignaniDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Centre for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus/Aalborg, Denmark; Research Center of Neuroscience "CRiN-Daniel Bovet", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Domenica BuetiInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to learn and adapt to new temporal regularities is pivotal to successfully interact with our environment. Research on rhythm processing has identified which features boost the learning of new rhythmic patterns and facilitate predictive behaviors, such as motor synchronization to them. How do humans learn to synchronize with new temporal patterns when these lack strong rhythmicity and predictability? Here we hypothesized that optimal synchronization with such patterns would require a probabilistic form of associative learning. In our experiment participants tapped a finger in synchrony with an auditory stream in which a familiar and a novel pattern alternated. The two patterns were made of the same intervals but arranged in reversed order, thus having different structures. Within the stream, the two patterns occurred with complementary probabilities, following a gradual transition from familiar to novel pattern across trials. We modelled synchronization performances as the result of a Bayesian inference process parameterized by a Rescorla-Wagner learning rule. Results showed that participants learned to synchronize to the novel pattern only when its predictability clearly exceeded that of the old one, i.e., a few trials after the actual transition in the patterns' probabilities. Parameter estimation makes us hypothesize two learning strategies to be tested in future work. On the one hand, "fast learners" may quickly learn to synchronize to each pattern and adapt to changes between them across trials. On the other hand, "slow learners" may slowly learn to synchronize to a pattern and fail to fully adjust to a novel one. Overall, our results provide preliminary evidence that probabilistic associative learning may offer a parsimonious account for how individuals learn to synchronize with new, variably predictable temporal patterns. This learning could be modulated by subject-specific strategies to adapt to rhythmic changes.

Indexed as

Association LearningAuditory PerceptionModels, PsychologicalPeriodicityPsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionAdultBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAssociative learningBayesian inferenceFinger tappingRescorla-WagnerRhythmSynchronizationTiming

Identifiers

PMID42030817
PMCPMC13167908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.