ArticleScientific reports2026
In silico analysis of PERK interactions with engineered alpha lactalbumin peptides using molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study integrates docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and free energy estimation to evaluate two engineered peptides, mutated peptide 52 (MuP52) and mutated peptide 250 (MuP250), derived from α-lactalbumin (α-LA), as potential modulators of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK). Molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA) calculations revealed that MuP250 exhibited slightly stronger overall binding to mouse PERK (mPERK) (ΔG = − 25.84 ± 5.27 kJ/mol) compared to MuP52 (ΔG = − 24.13 ± 6.14 kJ/mol), despite forming fewer hydrogen bonds. Both peptides stabilized the PERK αG-helix region without inducing major structural perturbations, as indicated by analyses of RMSD, RMSF, Rg, SASA, and hydrogen-bonding patterns. In human PERK (hPERK), MuP52 maintained stable binding (ΔG = − 22.79 ± 3.64 kJ/mol) and reduced local flexibility, suggesting potential cross-species relevance. Peptide binding also modulated the conformational landscape under conditions of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, with principal component analysis (PCA) confirming that MuP250 induced the greatest stabilization in mPERK. These results support the structural plausibility of αG-helix engagement by α-LA–derived peptides in the context of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and highlight the roles of hydrogen-bonding and nonpolar interactions in stabilization. The findings are derived exclusively from MD simulations and future in vitro and in vivo validation will be required to confirm the biological relevance and therapeutic potential of these peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.