Trial reportNature medicine2026
Targeted therapies plus radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the randomized phase 2 BIOMEDE trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02233049 (Biological Medicine for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biological Medicine for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) Eradication
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Extracellular Vesicles in Diffuse Midline Glioma: Emerging Mediators of Radiation Response and Therapeutic Resistance.Cancers · 2026Review
- Harnessing the power of biomarkers for diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the pediatric tumor with the worst prognosis. BIOMEDE was a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) (primary endpoint) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, mTOR inhibitor everolimus and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with a biopsy-proven DIPG. Tumors were assessed centrally for immunohistochemical biomarkers (EGFR overexpression or PTEN loss) together with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. A cohort of 66 children with the same inclusion criteria and treated previously with temozolomide-based regimen was used to compare outcome. Treatment allocation was performed by randomization in 233 patients, designed so that a drug could not be allocated if the corresponding biomarker was absent: 36 received erlotinib, 102 received dasatinib and 95 received everolimus. The trial was ended for futility of the primary endpoint following the recommendations of the independent data monitoring committee: OS from biopsy was not different from the control cohort (median OS = 10.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5-13.0)) in any of the three arms (median OS = 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.8-14.6) for erlotinib; 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.8-11.2) for dasatinib; and 11.9 months (95% CI: 10.7-14.2) for everolimus). Everolimus showed significantly less ocular, renal, skin and gastrointestinal side effects and treatment discontinuation for toxicity (secondary endpoint). TP53 mutations, frequently linked to multiple structural chromosomal aberrations, were the strongest predictor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9-4.2), P < 0.0001). Both mutations in and activation of the mTOR pathway were associated with a better response to everolimus. Four long-term survivors treated with an mTOR inhibitor were alive free of treatment over 6 years from diagnosis. With comprehensive tumor profiling, BIOMEDE validated prognostic biomarkers as well as informative theranostic biomarkers for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02233049 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.