Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032087›Full record

Reviewnpj biomedical innovations2026

3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.

Weijian Hua, Akhilesh K Gaharwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in npj biomedical innovations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weijian HuaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Akhilesh K GaharwarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. gaharwar@tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FDA Modernization Act 2.0 has shifted from animal testing to New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for preclinical drug development. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a premier NAM, capable of fabricating human-relevant complex models with high fidelity. This review surveys the primary bioprinting modalities, including inkjet, extrusion, vat photopolymerization, and their applications in creating functional in vitro models for drug screening and disease modeling. We analyze the operating mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of each technique, from high-resolution inkjet patterning to the rapid, layerless fabrication enabled by volumetric methods. Although challenges regarding regulatory validation, vascularization, and anatomical complexity persist, advanced bioprinting strategies incorporating biochemical cues, cellular diversity, and multi-tissue interactions are paving the way for more predictive and humane therapeutic pipelines. This work outlines the technological landscape and future directions for biofabrication in a post-animal testing era.

Identifiers

PMID42032087
PMCPMC13055088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.