Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032418›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied genetics2026

Artificial intelligence in neurofibromatosis type I: diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

Jagoda Błaszkiewicz, Agnieszka Madej-Pilarczyk, Elżbieta Ciara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jagoda BłaszkiewiczDepartment of Medical Genetics, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland. j.blaszkiewicz@ipczd.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4341-2413
Agnieszka Madej-PilarczykDepartment of Medical Genetics, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7671-2848
Elżbieta CiaraDepartment of Medical Genetics, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-7968

Funding

Instytut Pomnik - Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka S205/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic growth in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is driven by advances in computer processing power, memory, and data storage capabilities. The digital progress, combined with continuously growing datasets, enables the development of modern tools that support oncological, neurological, and genetic diagnostics. Achievements in the application of AI in medicine make it possible to analyze genotype–phenotype correlations, and rare diseases, which include more than 6,000 distinct conditions characterized by unique phenotypes and complex pathomechanisms, present a particular challenge in this context. This article presents the basic issues related to machine learning and describes the mechanisms of the most commonly used algorithms. In addition, a review was conducted of modern tools that enable the analysis of genotype–phenotype correlations and the prediction of symptoms of the rare disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Tools developed so far to support therapeutic decision-making related to NF1 were collected and described. The tools were classified according to their functionality, and their usefulness in the diagnostic process was discussed in detail, emphasizing how advanced algorithms can support precise phenotypic assessment and patient health evaluation and contribute to the optimization of their treatment. Despite its great potential, the use of AI in the diagnosis of rare diseases is associated with challenges such as the need to standardize small patient groups and the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration between experts in genetics, bioinformatics, laboratory medicine, and clinical medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningNeurofibromatosis Type 1Next-generation Sequencing

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.