ReviewJournal of applied genetics2026
Artificial intelligence in neurofibromatosis type I: diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic growth in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is driven by advances in computer processing power, memory, and data storage capabilities. The digital progress, combined with continuously growing datasets, enables the development of modern tools that support oncological, neurological, and genetic diagnostics. Achievements in the application of AI in medicine make it possible to analyze genotype–phenotype correlations, and rare diseases, which include more than 6,000 distinct conditions characterized by unique phenotypes and complex pathomechanisms, present a particular challenge in this context. This article presents the basic issues related to machine learning and describes the mechanisms of the most commonly used algorithms. In addition, a review was conducted of modern tools that enable the analysis of genotype–phenotype correlations and the prediction of symptoms of the rare disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Tools developed so far to support therapeutic decision-making related to NF1 were collected and described. The tools were classified according to their functionality, and their usefulness in the diagnostic process was discussed in detail, emphasizing how advanced algorithms can support precise phenotypic assessment and patient health evaluation and contribute to the optimization of their treatment. Despite its great potential, the use of AI in the diagnosis of rare diseases is associated with challenges such as the need to standardize small patient groups and the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration between experts in genetics, bioinformatics, laboratory medicine, and clinical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42032418What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.