Evidence mapPaperPMID 42032679Full record

SynthesisBMC nutrition2026

Culturally responsive nutrition interventions addressing chronic conditions in Latino adults living in the United States: a scoping review.

Vanessa Torres, Jailene Cruz, Liana Gutierrez, Iris Y Guzman-Ruiz, Paulina Monteon-Garcia, Leslie Aguilar-Hernandez, Juliet Gomez, Ashley Morales, Sydney Quintana, Caroline Marshall and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vanessa TorresCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. vanessa.torres@csmc.edu.
Jailene CruzCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Liana GutierrezSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Iris Y Guzman-RuizCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Paulina Monteon-GarciaCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Leslie Aguilar-HernandezCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Juliet GomezCalifornia State University, San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
Ashley MoralesCalifornia State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, USA.
Sydney QuintanaJohn Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caroline MarshallMedical Library, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rachelle BrossClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cody RaminCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yelba Castellon-LopezCancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatino communities in the United States face a disproportionate burden of chronic diseases, including higher rates of diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease. Many of these conditions are preventable through improved nutrition, yet the literature on culturally responsive nutrition focused interventions for Latino adults is fragmented, with inconsistent definitions of cultural adaptation and tailoring and limited evidence on the use of rigorous study designs and evidence-based approaches. This scoping review aims to synthesize nutrition interventions for Latino adults in the United States, assessing their design, cultural responsiveness, methodological rigor, and gaps to inform future strategies.

methodsA scoping review of the scientific literature was conducted by searching three bibliographic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL). The search strategy used categories from the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) to develop determinants based on the research question.

resultsOf 1,997 records identified, 36 studies (1.8%) met inclusion criteria after screening. Studies were excluded for not implementing a nutrition intervention, not including Latino participants, or lacking chronic disease outcomes. Diabetes was the most commonly addressed chronic condition (42%), followed by multiple chronic conditions (25%). Most studies (56%) employed randomized designs, primarily evaluating intervention effectiveness, while non-randomized studies focused more on pilot or feasibility assessments. Notably, 100% of interventions incorporated culturally responsive elements, with 81% being culturally tailored, predominantly targeting diabetes and multiple chronic conditions. In this scoping review, we focused on two approaches that promote cultural responsiveness: (1) cultural adaptation and (2) cultural tailoring. We define cultural adaptation as the systematic modification of an evidence-based intervention to align with a group’s cultural norms, language, and context. Cultural tailoring refers to customizing interventions based on individual-level characteristics, such as language or imagery.

conclusionFuture research should focus on developing and evaluating culturally responsive, prevention-oriented nutrition interventions. Employing rigorous randomized designs will be essential to effectively improve chronic disease outcomes in Latino populations. Standardizing definitions and frameworks for cultural adaptation is critical to advancing intervention science and enhancing health equity.

Indexed as

Chronic conditionsCultural adaptationCultural tailoringNutrition intervention

Identifiers

PMID42032679
PMCPMC13248250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.