SynthesisBMC nutrition2026
Culturally responsive nutrition interventions addressing chronic conditions in Latino adults living in the United States: a scoping review.
Synthesis in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLatino communities in the United States face a disproportionate burden of chronic diseases, including higher rates of diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease. Many of these conditions are preventable through improved nutrition, yet the literature on culturally responsive nutrition focused interventions for Latino adults is fragmented, with inconsistent definitions of cultural adaptation and tailoring and limited evidence on the use of rigorous study designs and evidence-based approaches. This scoping review aims to synthesize nutrition interventions for Latino adults in the United States, assessing their design, cultural responsiveness, methodological rigor, and gaps to inform future strategies.
methodsA scoping review of the scientific literature was conducted by searching three bibliographic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL). The search strategy used categories from the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) to develop determinants based on the research question.
resultsOf 1,997 records identified, 36 studies (1.8%) met inclusion criteria after screening. Studies were excluded for not implementing a nutrition intervention, not including Latino participants, or lacking chronic disease outcomes. Diabetes was the most commonly addressed chronic condition (42%), followed by multiple chronic conditions (25%). Most studies (56%) employed randomized designs, primarily evaluating intervention effectiveness, while non-randomized studies focused more on pilot or feasibility assessments. Notably, 100% of interventions incorporated culturally responsive elements, with 81% being culturally tailored, predominantly targeting diabetes and multiple chronic conditions. In this scoping review, we focused on two approaches that promote cultural responsiveness: (1) cultural adaptation and (2) cultural tailoring. We define cultural adaptation as the systematic modification of an evidence-based intervention to align with a group’s cultural norms, language, and context. Cultural tailoring refers to customizing interventions based on individual-level characteristics, such as language or imagery.
conclusionFuture research should focus on developing and evaluating culturally responsive, prevention-oriented nutrition interventions. Employing rigorous randomized designs will be essential to effectively improve chronic disease outcomes in Latino populations. Standardizing definitions and frameworks for cultural adaptation is critical to advancing intervention science and enhancing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.