Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032739›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026

Pathways to resilience: relationships between cognitive reserve, psychological debt, and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.

Hanna Boscheck, Maxie Luft, René Mauer, Selin Senguel, Ylenia D'elia, Peter Dechent, Klaus Fliessbach, Wenzel Glanz, Stefan Hetzer, Daniel Janowitz and 34 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Hanna Boscheck *German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Standort Dresden, Tatzberg 41, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Maxie Luft *German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Standort Dresden, Tatzberg 41, Dresden, 01307, Germany. maxie.luft@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7625-5673
René MauerFaculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry (IMB), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Selin SenguelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Standort Dresden, Tatzberg 41, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Ylenia D'eliaCenter for the Neuroscience of Embodied Cognition (CeNEC) at the Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Peter DechentDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, MR-Research in Neurosciences, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Klaus FliessbachGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Wenzel GlanzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Stefan HetzerBerlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel JanowitzInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ingo KilimannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.
Luca KleineidamGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Marie KronmüllerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Falk LüsebrinkInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research (IKND), Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lukas PreisDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Boris RauchmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ayda RostamzadehDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.
Björn Hendrik SchottGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany.
Sebastian SodenkampGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.
Eike SpruthGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.
Sophia StoeckleinDepartment of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Renat YakupovGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Gabriel ZieglerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Frederic BrosseronGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Katharina BuergerInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian Hellmann-RegenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph LaskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.
Robert PerneczkyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Oliver PetersDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Josef PrillerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.
Alfredo RamirezGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Anja SchneiderGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Annika SpottkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Stefan TeipelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.
Jens WiltfangGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany.
Frank JessenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Emrah DüzelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Sandra RöskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Michael WagnerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Franka GlöcknerFaculty of Psychology, Chair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Natalie L MarchantDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Olga Klimecki *Biological Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-7761
Miranka Wirth *German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Standort Dresden, Tatzberg 41, Dresden, 01307, Germany. miranka.wirth@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0725-7314
DELCODE study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotentially modifiable lifestyle and psychological factors may influence Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related brain pathology and cognitive function, thereby influencing cognitive resilience in late life.

objectiveThis cross-sectional study investigated associations and pathways between lifestyle and psychological factors related to cognitive reserve and psychological debt, AD-related biomarkers, and cognitive function, as well as potential differences in these associations between AD risk groups.

methodsIn total, 298 non-demented older adults (mean age = 69.5 years, 44% women) of the DELCODE study were included. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the associations between the constructs of cognitive reserve (education, occupational complexity, leisure activity participation) and psychological debt (depression and anxiety symptoms, neuroticism, sleep quality), manifest AD-related biomarkers (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] amyloid-beta [Aβ] 42, splenial white matter hyperintensities [WMH], hippocampal volume), and latent cognitive function of increased AD risk (Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite [PACC]). In the structural equation model, biomarkers were transformed such that higher values indicated greater AD-related brain pathology and age was included as a covariate. Multigroup analyses assessed moderations by established AD risk modifiers, namely sex and apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE ε4) genotype.

resultsIn the total sample, higher cognitive reserve was associated with better cognitive function (p = .005), independent of AD-related biomarkers. Higher cognitive reserve was associated with lower psychological debt (p = .035); however, neither construct showed a significant association with the AD-related biomarkers (p ≥ .177). AD-related biomarkers of CSF Aβ42 (p = .021), splenial WMH (p = .044), and hippocampal neurodegeneration (p = .007) were each independently associated with lower cognitive function. Most associations were comparable between AD risk groups stratified by sex and APOE ε4 genotype. The relationships between cognitive reserve and psychological debt, and between CSF Aβ42 and splenial WMH were stronger in APOE ε4 non-carriers than in carriers (all p ≤ .020).

conclusionsCognitive reserve emerges as a key resilience pathway, supporting late-life cognition independently of AD-related pathology, with largely consistent effects across AD risk groups. The role of psychological debt warrants longitudinal investigation, particularly in vulnerable older populations.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00007966, Registered: 4 May 2015.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive ReserveResilience, PsychologicalAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePeptide FragmentsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s disease (AD)APOE ε4 genotypeBiomarkersHealthy agingPreventionSex differencesStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID42032739
PMCPMC13107903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.