ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Owner-reported prevalence and severity of fear and anxiety in dogs.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety and fear in animals affect their current, and potential long-term, welfare. The prevalence of this problem has been studied by various authors, but considerable variety exists in reported values, methods used to gather data, and location of the dogs. Because preferred breeds and the way dogs are raised and kept vary considerably by country, the location of the animals studied can affect reported data. In order to obtain robust estimates in this regard for the United States, data from 43,517 dogs enrolled by their owners in the Dog Aging Project (DAP) were used to determine the prevalence and severity of anxiety/fear shown by these dogs. Behaviors of anxiety and fearfulness were assessed based on owners’ responses to nine questions. These questions were divided into four multi-question categories (anxiety/fearfulness in response to unfamiliar people, unfamiliar dogs, unfamiliar occurrences in the environment, and grooming). Ratings used by owners were based on a 5-point scale between 0 (no problem) and 4 (extreme fear). Data were analyzed to determine the prevalence of this problem at each rating level. Overall, 91.0% of dogs in the study received at least one rating of level 2 (mild/moderate fear/anxiety) or higher in severity across all nine questions. Specifically, the studied dogs were reported to show fear/anxiety toward unfamiliar people (22.3% of dogs); unfamiliar dogs (47.4%); unfamiliar situations, objects, or noise (25.5%); and grooming (33.0%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.