Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42034466›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2026

The island biology of the host microbiome.

Amar Sarkar, Aura Raulo, Mason R Stothart, Neil G O Ibata, Siobhán Harty, C Jessica E Metcalf, Brendan J M Bohannan, Gordon M Bennett, Rachel N Carmody

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amar SarkarDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: amarsarkar@g.harvard.edu.
Aura RauloDepartment of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mason R StothartFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Neil G O IbataDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Siobhán HartyIndependent, Old Cabra Road, Dublin, Ireland.
C Jessica E MetcalfDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Brendan J M BohannanInstitute of Ecology & Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Gordon M BennettDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, USA; National Science Foundation Biological Integration Institute-INSITE, University of California, Merced, CA, USA.
Rachel N CarmodyDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Social Microbiome Assembly, Function, and Impacts on Host HealthRM1GM158513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Brendan Bohannan, JUDITH S EISEN · 2025 to 2026
$3.6M
Deciphering and predicting ecologically sensitive gut microbiome contributions to human metabolic healthR35GM160067 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Rachel Naomi Carmody · 2025 to 2026
$843k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM160067NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM158513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes perform critical functions for their hosts, and understanding microbiome variation is important for both basic and applied science. However, host traits alone cannot explain the entirety of microbiome variation, because, alongside host traits, microbiomes are shaped by multiple ecological processes. Researchers have thus turned to theories of island biology, conceptualising animal hosts as islands and animal microbiomes as metacommunities that assemble within and disperse between host islands. To develop realistic models, this host-as-island metaphor must be examined by explicitly comparing geological and host islands. Here, we critically examine the host-as-island metaphor by evaluating how microbiome variation is shaped by the four metacommunity processes that explain biodiversity on geological islands: local interspecies interactions, local selection, dispersal, and stochasticity. Key differences between host islands and geological islands include the complexity of microbiome transmission networks arising from host mobility and sociality and the capacity of hosts to evolve to control their microbiomes. We conclude with discussions of how eco-evolutionary dynamics differ between geological islands and host islands, and the reciprocal relevance of island biology and microbiome science.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionIslandscommunity assemblyisland biogeographyisland ecologymetacommunity ecologymicrobial transmissionmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID42034466
PMCPMC13340434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.