ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2026
Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a qualitative interview-based study.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designQualitative, descriptive study of audio recorded, transcribed and analyzed data, based on individual semi-structured interviews using an interview guide.
objectivesTo describe the subjective experience and quality of life (QoL) of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and identify elements of importance in determining QoL.
settingSwedish outpatient clinic.
methodsIndividuals with SCI were recruited from a specialized SCI outpatient clinic, with eligibility limited to those who had attended at least one prior clinical follow-up. No interventions were applied. Data were collected through qualitative interviews, and the primary outcome measure was the identification of key themes influencing QoL following SCI, as perceived and reported by participants.
resultsThe interviews identified several key factors with perceived impact on the subjects' QoL including difficulties in managing everyday life, the desire to live an independent life, the significance of community and a sense of belonging, current life situation in relation to others and past experiences, and dealing with physical problems, and in particular pain, related to SCI.
conclusionParticipants highlighted independence, social connections, and managing SCI- related physical issues as crucial for their quality of life. They emphasized the community's role in helping individuals with SCI, live meaningful lives and pursue personal goals and aspirations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.