ArticleScientific reports2026
Athletic ability discrepancy, risk-taking, and recovery quality as predictors of match-related injuries in adolescent soccer players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective cohort study aimed to identify predictors of match-related injuries in 40 male adolescent soccer players (mean age 15.25 ± 0.87 years) across 20 regional league matches during the 2023–2024 season. Prior to each match, players completed validated assessments of mental fatigue, recovery quality, perceived match load, perceived injury risk, risk-taking behaviors, and athletic ability, with self- and coach ratings calculated to determine the Athletic Ability Discrepancy Score. All musculoskeletal injuries, regardless of time loss or medical attention, were documented by physiotherapists based on Fuller and Ekstrand’s criteria. Results revealed that 47.5% of players sustained at least one injury (26 injuries total), with a rate of 24.9 injuries per 1,000 match hours. Contusions (46.2%) and sprains (30.8%) were most common. Multivariate GEE analysis identified three significant injury predictors: a higher Athletic Ability Discrepancy Score (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.10–1.99, p = 0.01), lower recovery quality (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.99, p = 0.04), and greater risk-taking behaviors (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.03–2.32, p = 0.04). Mental fatigue, match load, and perceived injury risk were not significant predictors (P > 0.05). These findings highlight the need for psychological screening, particularly for other self-rating discrepancies, and interventions promoting realistic self-assessment, behavioural regulation, and structured recovery in youth injury prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.