ArticleBMC psychology2026
The impact of 24-hour sleep deprivation on attention networks in individuals with short-video addiction.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the effects of 24-hour sleep deprivation on attention network performance in college students with short-video addiction.
methodsBased on the screening criteria of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI) and the modified Internet Addiction Test (IAT), 34 college students in the short-video addiction group and 37 college students in the control group were selected after screening. Both groups completed the Attention Network Test (ANT) before and after sleep deprivation. Reaction time and accuracy were recorded, and alerting, orienting, and executive control effects were calculated. In addition, inverse efficiency score (IES) was calculated to comprehensively evaluate task performance.
resultsNo significant main effect of group, main effect of time, or group × time interaction was observed for reaction time under any of the five conditions. Accuracy results showed that the control group had overall higher accuracy than the addiction group, and both groups showed decreased accuracy after sleep deprivation, but the interaction was not significant. Analysis of effect scores showed that the addiction group had significantly lower alerting and orienting effects than the control group; the orienting effect showed a significant main effect of time; and the executive control effect showed a significant main effect of time as well as a significant group × time interaction. Inverse efficiency scores (IES) analysis showed that only the incongruent condition had a significant main effect of time.
conclusionThe short-video addiction group showed behavioral patterns on attention network-related indices that differed from those of the control group, mainly reflected in weaker benefits from alerting and orienting cues and higher executive control conflict cost. After sleep deprivation, the orienting effect decreased and the executive control conflict cost increased, with the addiction group showing more obvious behavioral changes in executive control-related indices. This study provides preliminary behavioral evidence for understanding the potential attention risks related to short-video addiction and insufficient sleep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.