ArticleJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2026
Measurement Properties and Quality of Maternal Breastfeeding Instruments: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent questionnaires are available to assess breastfeeding behaviour and factors that impact breastfeeding success. However, it is necessary to determine whether the questionnaire's measurement properties are satisfactory before using them.
aimEvaluate, compare, and summarise the measurement properties and quality of the original version of maternal breastfeeding questionnaires.
methodsThis review used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-Scr). Peer-reviewed primary research studies that focused on the development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding instruments were included. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instrument (COSMIN) methodology was used to assess the methodological quality and measurement properties of the breastfeeding instruments.
resultsFrom 3,850 abstracts, 25 papers were identified. Only six instruments demonstrated sufficient content validity and internal consistency and were recommended for broad use. The results obtained with these instruments can be trusted. Sixteen of the 25 instruments had evidence of indeterminate (±) content validity. Although they had the potential for recommendation, further research is needed to assess their quality. None of the instruments reported cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, measurement error, or responsiveness. One instrument was not recommended for use due to insufficient content validity.
conclusionThe review highlights the need for further research into the measurement properties of most existing breastfeeding instruments, especially cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, measurement error, and criterion validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.