ArticleBiophysical reports2026
Distinct disassembly modes shape cytoskeletal assembly and fluctuations.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How distinct cytoskeletal structures assemble and maintain their characteristic sizes on different timescales while drawing from a shared pool of subunits remains an open question in cell biology. Experiments indicate that mechanisms promoting the disassembly of these structures and replenishing the pool may play a vital role. Here, we compare two disassembly models: one with a constant monomer loss rate and another that is size dependent, where structures lose filament fragments through severing. Using analytical calculations and simulations, we examine their effects on the assembly of two structure types, filaments and bundles composed of linear filaments, both in isolation and when co-assembling in a shared pool. We find that both models control assembly and regulate structure size in distinct ways. However, the assembly of both structures to their steady-state size is accelerated with severing, accompanied by a faster decay of autocorrelations in their length fluctuations. Moreover, we find that severing can regulate multiple structures assembling from a shared pool, constraining them to defined sizes. Our study identifies key parameters governing assembly kinetics and fluctuation dynamics associated with each disassembly mode, highlights measurable quantities such as coefficient of variation and bundle tapering that can help distinguish between different disassembly mechanisms, and reveals specific signatures of structures assembling in a limited monomer pool. Together, these results provide a framework for experiments to identify assembly-control mechanisms in cytoskeletal structures and elucidate the role specific disassembly modes can have in modulating structure formation and maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.