ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2026
First step towards predicting clinical immunogenicity of biologics using in vitro based readouts as animal trial alternatives.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunogenicity risk assessment is a critical step in the therapeutic development process of biologics. However, anti-drug antibodies continue to occur in the clinic, compromising safety and efficacy and contributing to discontinuation of otherwise effective drugs. In order to evaluate the predictive power of current preclinical tools of clinical immunogenicity, we collated, normalized, and analyzed published in vitro immunogenicity data across therapeutic proteins and monoclonal antibodies and correlated with clinical ADA frequency. Overall, combined in vitro readouts showed weak correlation with clinical immunogenicity, consistent with the limited translational performance of conventional assays. Bridging the mechanistic gaps in presentation and processing of biologics-for example, through assays that capture dendritic cell migration-substantially improved predictive power. Accordingly, New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) should integrate biologically relevant mechanisms, micro physiological systems (MPS), and advanced Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning tools combined with data science to enhance the accuracy and translational relevance of immunogenicity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.