ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2026
2025 Consensus Clinical Management Guidelines for Niemann-Pick Disease Type C.
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 2025 Consensus Clinical Management Guidelines for Niemann-Pick Disease Type C.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2018, the International Niemann-Pick Disease Alliance (INPDA) and the International Niemann-Pick Disease Registry (INPDR) developed and published comprehensive clinical management guidelines to support inclusive and standardized care pathways in Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC)-an ultra-rare, autosomal recessive, neurovisceral lysosomal disorder. Since then, advances in diagnostics, care, and the approval of two novel disease-modifying agents have underscored the need to revise these guidelines to ensure safe, consistent, and high-quality care for those affected by NPC. In response, the INPDA and INPDR convened a multidisciplinary Guidelines Development Group (GDG) comprising individuals with NPC expertise from 14 countries across five continents, representing a broad range of specialties, as well as patients and families involved in NPC care. Informed by a comprehensive literature review and two meetings, the GDG systematically reviewed, revised, and updated the 2018 guideline statements, re-evaluating the level of evidence, strength of recommendations, and expert agreement for each. The resulting 2025 consensus clinical management guidelines constitute a timely, up-to-date, and internationally applicable resource for the diagnosis, treatment, and holistic management of individuals with NPC. These guidelines serve as a critical resource for specialist centers, hospital-based medical teams, staff involved in NPC patient care, family physicians and other primary caregivers, and, importantly, patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.