ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
CAPIRE score predicts long-term major cardiac events.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CAPIRE score in suspected coronary artery disease: predicting spontaneous events or downstream revascularization?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the gold standard for non-invasive coronary atherosclerosis evaluation. Purpose To evaluate the performance of advanced atherosclerosis analysis by CCTA in predicting long-term major cardiac events in subjects enrolled in the multicenter CAPIRE study. Materials and methods CAPIRE prospectively enrolled subjects with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent advanced plaque assessment by CCTA. Outcome measures were two combined endpoints: acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and major adverse cardiac events MACE (ACS+cardiac death+late non-urgent revascularization). Results The final CAPIRE population comprised 528 subjects (age 60 ± 8 years, 308 men). CCTA showed no CAD in 348 (65.9%) and CAD in 180. Follow-up was obtained in 522 subjects (98.8%) over a median of 7 (4.5–7) years. In total, 72 events were recorded (13 ACS, 14 cardiac deaths and 45 late non-urgent revascularizations). The volume of non-calcific plaques showed the best predictive ability for ACS (AUC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84–0.96), whereas the Leaman score was the best discriminator for MACE (AUC = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81–0.89). At multivariate Cox regression analysis using an epidemiological approach, age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.07; p = 0.04), male sex (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.43–5.32; p = 0.0025), glycated hemoglobin (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13–1.72;p = 0.0021), and non-calcific plaque volume (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01; p < 0.0001) remained significant independent predictors of MACE. Weighted HRs for independent predictors of MACE were used to create the new CAPIRE SCORE that was cross-validated yielding an AUC of 0.85. Conclusions In subjects with suspected CAD, our findings support a robust prognostic value of CCTA-derived high-risk atherosclerotic features combined with clinical variables to predict major cardiac events at long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42036619What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.