ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026
Urine-derived stem cells in kidney disease: progress, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global health burden with limited treatment options that address the underlying causes of fibrosis or promote regeneration. Urine-derived stem cells (USCs) have emerged as a promising tool in regenerative nephrology, offering a non-invasive and accessible source of multipotent cells with therapeutic potential. Sharing key properties with mesenchymal stem cells, USCs demonstrate paracrine activity, immunomodulation, and efficient extracellular vesicle (EV) production, and have shown anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and pro-regenerative effects in preclinical models of acute and chronic kidney injury. Recent advances in biomaterials and delivery technologies, including scaffold-free cell sheets and engineered EVs, have further enhanced the potential of USC-based therapies. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding functional integration, delivery optimization, and donor variability. This review summarizes the current progress in USC-based kidney therapy, identifies key limitations, and outlines future directions to support the translation of USC-based interventions into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.