Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036735›Full record

ReviewClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Efficacy and Safety of Olanzapine Long-acting Injection in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jithin Thekkelkuthiyathottil Joseph, Rashmi Vishwanath, Sonia Shenoy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jithin Thekkelkuthiyathottil JosephClinical Research Centre for Neuromodulation in Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-9497
Rashmi VishwanathDepartment of Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-7518
Sonia ShenoyDepartment of Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8998-6328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI) is a second-generation antipsychotic used in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, particularly those with poor adherence. However, evidence on its comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability remains limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest) were searched through May 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies evaluating olanzapine LAI in adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (Version 2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4. Nine studies (n = 2,915) met inclusion criteria; only two RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis. Olanzapine LAI showed no significant difference from oral olanzapine in reducing Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores (mean difference = 1.41; 95% CI: -0.22 to 3.04;

Indexed as

Antipsychotic agentsMeta-analysisOlanzapinePsychotic disordersSchizophreniaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42036735
PMCPMC13122169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.