Evidence mapPaperPMID 42036745Full record

ArticleClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Cellular Senescence of Patient-derived Fibroblasts Reveals the Mid-old Stage as a Critical Window for Transcriptomic Signatures Linked to Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers and Classification.

Young Joon Cho, Sunwoo Yoon, Yeojin Kim, Ho Min Song, You Jin Nam, Sang Hyuk Lee, Sehee Lee, Donghyuk Shin, Sun Min Lee, So Young Moon and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Young Joon ChoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6474-3231
Sunwoo YoonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-1781
Yeojin KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-7415
Ho Min SongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6804-8680
You Jin NamDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-5586
Sang Hyuk LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-8176
Sehee LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1659-3017
Donghyuk ShinDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4958-5036
Sun Min LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-015X
So Young MoonDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-1968
Eun-Joo KimDepartment of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1377
Soo Hyun ChoDepartment of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-1468
Byeong C KimDepartment of Neurology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6827-6730
Seong Hye ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-8364
Sang Won SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-0122
Jin Cheol KimDepartment of Dermatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-8811
Young Joon ParkDepartment of Dermatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0723-4136
Hee Young KangDepartment of Dermatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-4292
Sang-Rae LeeEfficacy Test Center for Mental & Behavioral Disorders, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-5973
Sunhwa HongDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-6360
Sang Joon SonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-7996
Chang Hyung HongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-7611
Hyun Woong RohDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-358X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is strongly associated with aging, yet the interactions remain unclear. This study modeled replicative senescence in patient-derived fibroblasts to compare gene expression between AD dementia and controls across senescence stages and to evaluate whether stage-specific alterations reflect disease characteristics with diagnostic implications. Methods: Dermal fibroblasts from 13 AD dementia patients and 13 healthy controls were repeatedly passaged to induce replicative senescence and classified into young (passage 7), mid-old (passage 18), and old stages (passage 25-28). Transcriptomic profiling was performed by RNA sequencing, followed by stepwise gene extraction, machine learning-based classification, and correlation analyses with AD biomarkers. Results: Fibroblasts were successfully driven into replicative senescence, validated by SA-β-gal staining, increased expression of CDKN1A and CDKN2A, and transcriptomic age acceleration. From transcriptome data, 605 senescence-associated genes were identified, enriched in extracellular matrix remodeling, chromatin organization, and immune-related pathways. Machine learning classifiers trained on these genes achieved the highest accuracy at the mid-old stage above 0.9, markedly outperforming the young and old stages. In addition, among the most consistently selected mid-old genes, H2AC18, H1-2, and LTBP1 showed significant correlations with cortical amyloid burden and plasma pTau217, linking cellular transcriptomic changes to established AD biomarkers. Conclusion: In summary, replicative senescence models of patient-derived fibroblasts revealed that transcriptomic differences between AD dementia and controls peak at the mid-old stage. This transitional window represents the most informative point for capturing disease-related alterations with strong biomarker relevance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s dementiaCellular senescenceFibroblastsMachine learningTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID42036745
PMCPMC13122170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.